Friday, 25 May 2012

Art & Design

Yesterday, on my way back south from the north, I decided to divert via Victoria. There I waited for the illusive Wrightbus LT-class NBfL “Borismaster”, only to find it didn’t arrive. Instead, the only London-specific vehicles I saw were an original RM and a group of three people using Boris’s Barclay’s Bike hire, the modern equivalent of the white bicycle.

I was, however, rewarded for my patience when the second timetabled departure ran as planned. This was the first time I’d seen NB4L in the flesh. My thoughts? They still remain the same. Frontally, the design was challenging and certainly struggles with the concept of a modern icon, though I did admire the Alexander J-type roofline rather a lot. I think that the designer tried too hard to make a frontal statement and it looked a little more TV Century 21 than 21st century (older readers may get the analogy).

To the off-side, the glazed staircase was an interesting, eye-catching though immodest feature (especially in hot weather, if you get my drift). The rear actually had an elegance about it but there still might be too much metal in that dome but then again, this does need to house the second stairwell. And it didn’t help that it emitted a constant sound pitch akin to a Deltic engine* on steroids, coming from either the hybrid itself or the air conditioning operating at full tilt in the heat.

So, the only bus in Britain whose rear is better than its front, perhaps?

But, inside, well, that was different. There were little touches that marked it out as a piece of decent industrial design, like the seat pattern, the front, rear and stairs grooved flooring and the “proper”, curved stairwells.

The LT class doesn’t have a monopoly on interesting or even good design. But is it “beautiful”—and is this a label you can add to a bus, anyway? It’s certainly difficult to define beauty in industrial design, as it’s a very complicated and subjective thought. It’s something you know when you see it. I’m not sure I quite recognise it as such in the LT class. But there’s certainly something about it that marks it out as different, perhaps from the inside out, perhaps from the rear.

May be, leaving aside the issues of whether an open platform is a Good Thing, it’s because the design is a very practical one. Ultimately, industrial design is a part of selling products. If it blends functionality and form, it will sell, or so design economics would have you believe. The strange thing in London, unlike the rest of the country, is that there’s no commercial market to please and therefore, in London, no one actually needs to like the LT design for it to be a success. Other than the mayor, of course.

*—the noisy Deltic engines were used in British Railways Board Class 66s 55s of the mid-1960s, called railway locomotives. Locomotives were vehicles that were once coupled ahead of a train of cars, coaches or carriages used to pull the them. They were popular before the era of unit trains : )

20 comments:

Martin Hooper said...

The Deltics were Class 55 not 66...

Anonymous said...

"the modern equivalent of the white bicycle"

Don't you mean white elephant?

:-)

Anonymous said...

Nice to see the word 'train' correctly defined. A 'locomotive' is never a 'train'. And trains stop at railway stations.

TE3011 said...

Good to see the rear platform issue being seperated from the more general ones. OK, they form one whole, but to the rest of the UK market which would, no doubt, consider the LT as a hybrid 'decker alternative, the fact it can have a door at the back is irrelevent.

London will be London, for the rest of us questions such as "does the technology work?" "is it more efficient than other hybrid designs?" and (perhaps) "can it be clothed in the standard Wright bodywork?" are more relevent.

Time will tell, of course, whether the LT remains a Metropolitan curio or becomes a mainstream work horse.

Anonymous said...

If anyone's trying to find the Borismasters, don't rely on Victoria. Go mid route so, even if an all too common curtailment occurs, you'll still see it.

David said...

A glazed stairwell? Excellent for those peeping toms amongst us...

N90734 said...

David said...
A glazed stairwell? Excellent for those peeping toms amongst us...

Hmm.... maybe time to bring back the "decency boards" as fitted to B, K, S, NS types?

But, staying on the offside, I expect ad agencies and poster firms will bless the odd-shaped ad panel caused by the glazed stairwell.

Like many liveries that appear to have been designed without thought that one day they might be interrupted by advertising, it sadly illustrates the gap between designers and economic reality!

Anonymous said...

Mm, Wrightbus LT-class NBfL
What about the overseas bits such as the VDL chassis

Anonymous said...

It does *not* have a VDL chassis. It incorporates some VDL parts but is built by, and taxed as, Wrightbus.

The same applies to the Wrightbus 2DL which people (elsewhere) insist on ascribing to VDL.

Anonymous said...

One look at the spider-veined, cellulite-pitted heaps of booze-sodden flab you're likely to see climbing the stairs in the LTs' catchment area and you'll never make the mistake of gawping up the staircase again. You'll be rendered impotent!

plcd1 said...

You may even have travelled on LT4 which was only delivered on Wednesday and entered service yesterday. By a complete fluke I happened to see it on Roseberry Avenue with LT6 going the other way. I leapt off my bus to get a snap at the Angel and having done so thought I had missed it but it got stopped at lights so I got on at the back - a step back in time.

I opted to sit on the rear downstairs seat which is a tad cramped with poor legroom plus I bashed my head when sitting down. It was interesting to watch people happily using the rear platform and tapping their Oyster cards as if they'd done it for years. The engine was also working overtime and was quite noisy and intrusive where I was seated.

Despite the buses having been in service for several weeks there was still a reaction from the public as the bus passed by. I thought local people would have got past their surprise by now. We all got bundled off at Mildmay Park as the bus was on a short turn - probably the result of chronic traffic problems at Piccadilly due to roads being closed for Jubilee / Olympic preparations.

I have very mixed feelings about NBfL. The external design is rather weird and lopsided while aspects of the internal design are nice. The economics of its operation are very questionable and it is not possible to see where the money for buying and operating 600 more of them is going to come from. If it comes from cuts on the rest of the network then it is too high a price to pay.

The other aspect that causes concern is that the bus is so heavy that it is restricted to a total passenger load of 77 people rather than 87 for every other TfL standard bus. You don't need to be a genius to work out how that issue further affects the economics of running a route with these buses compared to "normal" ones.

Anonymous said...

More importantly - did you enjoy the Album conference? ;-)

Neil said...

"The other aspect that causes concern is that the bus is so heavy that it is restricted to a total passenger load of 77 people rather than 87 for every other TfL standard bus. You don't need to be a genius to work out how that issue further affects the economics of running a route with these buses compared to "normal" ones."

That's got nothing to do with the bodywork, though, has it? I assume it's the hybrid kit that is the extra weight?

I see no reason why you shouldn't be able to put that bodywork and interior (minus the rear platform, I guess) onto any standard decker chassis you want.

Neil

Neil said...

"Don't you mean white elephant?"

Don't know about white bicycles, but the Boris Bikes seem to be very popular and successful. Profitable, probably not, but that wasn't the objective.

Neil

viewfromthesouth said...

I've just twigged - there's TfL been banging on for years about straight staircases on double decks and all of a sudden the goalposts have changed for the LT!

I'm susprised that Messrs Daniels and Hendy weren't driving as every time I open an industry publication, one of them seems to have escaped the office to play with the new toy. Mind you, at least it is a step up from their previous, 60 year old museum-piece toys of habit.

The fact remains that it is an eye-wateringly expensive, overweight and inefficient vanity project which has no place on the streets in this era of austerity.

Anonymous said...

Only being able to carry 77 passengers means that it doesn't now meet the criteria that was laid down. How are they going to change it?

Of course it's heavier because of the extra length and all that glass - but then they knew that all along, so who didn't do the calculations properly ?

Cut out that silly rear platform (and thereby a need for an expensive 2nd person) and you'll be nearly there.

Busing said...

"Nice to see the word 'train' correctly defined. A 'locomotive' is never a 'train'. And trains stop at railway stations"

We pulled up at one station and there was even a poster referring wrongly to a "train station". Pedant as I am<, I point this out in conversation but always get blank looks. A battle lost?

"Time will tell, of course, whether the LT remains a Metropolitan curio or becomes a mainstream work horse"

Indeed. Might the money be on the former, though?

"If anyone's trying to find the Borismasters, don't rely on Victoria. Go mid route so, even if an all too common curtailment occurs, you'll still see it"

My plan was to travel partway on one and return on another. But the initial no-show curtailed the amount of time I had to board the (one) LT.

The nearside advertising panel seems normal enough.

"I opted to sit on the rear downstairs seat which is a tad cramped with poor legroom plus I bashed my head when sitting down"

Ah, perhaps this bus is no different to any other, then…

"The engine was also working overtime and was quite noisy and intrusive where I was seated"

My observation, too.

"Despite the buses having been in service for several weeks there was still a reaction from the public as the bus passed by"

Neither Versas, Deltas, flat-fronted Atlanteans in an age of half-cabs nor Solos get anything like the attention the LT gets and that's thanks to the publicity machine. Mind you, artics turned heads but for all the wrong reasons.

"More importantly - did you enjoy the Album conference? ;-)"

Many applaud the tenacity of last man standing Peter Shipp for his work at EYMS but no one had any idea that he could control the weather so!

Pete said...

I assume TFL will not allow other cities to copy the exterior design - it won't be iconic if everyone has one. I guess no one else wants rear platforms. Any technical innovations - power train, bodywork - can be applied to normal designs. Just a one-off.

PS if you are conscious of saying 'railway station', it's too late, the language has changed.

plcd1 said...

@ Busing - the downstairs seat layout and spacing on the NBfL is rather odd. The rearmost seats are set very high up even compared to other LFDDs. The seats upstairs are rather better spaced. I cannot recall the last time I bashed my head on the ceiling of any bus whether at the front or the rear or on the lower / upper deck.

It is a shame that a bus that is supposed to be so cutting edge has quite a number of basic errors. Some of those errors are possibly tolerable / fixable but others are fundamental to the economics of bus operation. The political push to get 600 of these (unproven) vehicles into service in 4 years could have unexpected consequences for passengers, operators and politicians.

Anonymous said...

It can't go into volume production until it meets the original TfL spec for 87 capacity.