Monday, 5 March 2012

Rewards

Planning for and implementing a smartcard system for your business doesn’t come easily or cheaply (and here we’re talking about cash-paying customers rather than “simply” for free travellers). It’s somewhat akin to the major project that saw the widespread introduction of electronic ticket machines from the late 1980s.

There is a difference, though. If ETMs went wrong, it risked your revenue. That was bad enough. But if smartcard technology goes belly up, not only is your revenue down but customers who’ve pre-loaded payments will probably think twice about using the bus ever again. You lose face, completely, so it risks your reputation as well as your revenue.

Go Ahead’s The Key keeps on rolling... with another major rollout today. How may landmarks from how many areas can you recognise? I’m sure I see something from the Berlin landscape...

Fortunately, there are generally few significant problems with the introduction of smartcard technology, these days. The February 2012 Wilts & Dorset Salisbury & Bluestar The Key launch went OK. Oxford Bus Company’s installation of Go Ahead’s The Key from October 2010 was the one major smartcard system that went awry at the beginning, thanks in the main to a larger than anticipated card failure rate. This in spite of the backing of one of the Big Five. It proves that no matter the investment, the planning and the consultants, you can never be totally sure.

With the risks come rewards. It’s two years since (Transdev) Yellow Buses introduced its Glo smartcard. It proved popular right from the start. The number of smart transactions has seen a 70 per cent year-on-year increase. No more purchases of throw away paper Yellow Cards that needed to be sucked into then spat out of a reader (and were rejected if bent, buckled, been in the washing machine or the reader was having a bad day).

Yellow Buses says that using its smartcards means quicker boarding times. They’re right, of course, but there’s not yet the critical mass available to save on PVR. Glo accounts for about 15 per cent of travel. But imagine the prospect. The P.T.E.G. believes that when (if?) *all* journeys are cashless then there’d be a three per cent reduction in operating costs owing to reduced boarding and a four per cent increase in demand. This eventually *has* to translate into PVR savings and the reality isn’t too far away. The transport minister wants “most” journeys to be cashless by 2014.
At some point, then, faster boarding could actually result in fewer vehicles. If you add up all the odd seconds saved, it’s inevitable. And if you manage that on several corridors, the project pays for itself, in spite of those consultants and those planning headaches.
Is this pie-in-the-sky? It won’t work on low frequency routes, of course, but on busier ones, there’s a prospect. With W&D introducing it’s The Key product to the critical south Dorset network from today, Yellow Buses will lose its Glo advantage, though it has a two-year head start. The one corridor where it’s conceivable to make PVR savings—eventually—is the More M1 & M2 services. A round trip time of over 120 minutes and 16 buses an hour could, might, reap the benefit. Competing as it does with Yellow Buses, it’s the only corridor on which W&D will have an e-purse facility available (the others offer seasons—with questionable passenger time savings).

For now, though, W&D needs to get through the initial few weeks. Give thanks for the support of a large group. And, meanwhile, we must now all plan post-ITSO for contactless debit cards.

20 comments:

Anonymous said...

Key, Glo, other electronic systems - why do they have to be individual rather than pan-operator and pan-mode (something like a super Oyster Card)?

David said...

The systems don't have to be specific to one operator. In time, they probably won't be.

We're starting to see some multi-operator tickets becoming available on ITSO smartcards in the north east. Conessionary bus passes have been on ITSO smartcards for a couple of years now, valid on all operators. Nexus, the T&W PTE, have put the U-16 identity card on to an ITSO smartcard too. The new ticket machines being installed on the Metro will be ITSO compatible, allowing PTE seasons to transfer on to ITSO cards.

The reason why these tickets are operator-specific are tied to the same reasons why bus seasons in all non-PTE areas tend to be operator-specific.

David said...

To add, IIRC Oxford was the first operator in the Go Ahead stable to transfer to "the key". Obviously they had a lot of teething problems but they don't tend to be repeating now. There's been a couple of minor problems with the rollout on Go North East, but nothing major, and you'd expect them to be learning all the time.

Anonymous said...

I miss proper tickets; I collected them, and felt more connected to the system than the anonymous swipe-card affair tends to be. With tickets you knew how many people were using the route as well as you, from the difference in the numbers; you could have 'lucky' tickets (where the four figures added up to 21, or you got four identical figures; 5555 or 6666 etc).

Pete said...

Which is considered best? Smartcards where you tell the driver your destination, swipe card and collect ticket. Or Trent Barton's Mango, where you swipe in and swipe off, and there's no passenger/driver interaction?

Anonymous said...

Completely disagree that there's no customer/driver interaction with MANGO on trent barton - the driver still ensures they greet you and say goodbye when you leave the bus.

Sceptic said...

Anonymous @ 1018

Unless a third party introduces them, trying to make one operator's new products available on another's requires very many competition law hoops to be jumped through. It's happening in Oxford, where the local authority has used Local Transport Act powers to co-ordinate.

There's also a question of cost - 14p from every £ of TfL's revenue is needed to pay for Oyster. Most commercial operators would be aghast at such a high overhead.

I am puzzled though at Busing's assertion that Smartcards are faster. There's not much magnetic card technology in use now (if I've interpreted the description quickly) but watch somewhere like Lothian which has commercial smartcards as well as statutory concessionary ones: the buses are at stops for far longer than they ever used to be with flash passes. If they ever introduce them at Travel West Midlands, they'll either need to cut frequencies or increase the PVR.

N90734 said...

As far as I know, the problems at Oxford ocuurred because they started with Wayfarer non-ITSO equipment and then converted to ERG ITSO-compliant equipment. Cards had to be reissued and balances etc transferred.

Anonymous said...

Smart cards are quicker when you use an e-purse facility (no handing over of cash or change) but slower where it replaces a flash pass.

Wait for contactless debit caqrds. They should be multi-operator because they act as an e-purse.

Anonymous said...

Smartcards are only slower than flash passes because the driver isn't checking it as thoroughly. Although as a minimum the driver should be checking the expiry date (and this is by no means a given), they could also see if the pass looks authentic and not forged, but time constraints mean many/most drivers will wave passes on without a thorough check most of the time.

Smartcards are (currently) harder to forge, partly because of the checks taking place by the equipment.

Eric said...

For those using contactless payment cards or smart cards, do the systems that are in place ensure that passengers only pay up to the maximum of an all-day/weekly ticket?

Anonymous said...

Many different views here.One wonders if the technology is cost effective,especially with regards to breakdowns of equipment ,lack of guarantees from suppliers etc. The only way it will work is if we have something akin to mastercard/visa.

Anonymous said...

Smart cards appear not to sped up passenger loading times and probably slow them down. They are widespread in South Wales but have not improved loading times so there is nothing to be gained journey time from them

Pete said...

No one has answered my question, but based on the comments suggesting that smartcard offer minimal boarding time savings, I would deduce that these operators still issue a paper ticket. If that is the case there will be little or no difference to the time taken with exact fare cash systems. For true boarding and alighting time savings I think the Trent Barton Mango system is the way to go, touching in and touching out with no passenger/driver interaction. This I believe is the way First are going with contactless credit/debit card readers.

"Firsts new ticketing system will act much like Londons Oyster Card; customers will simply 'touch in' and 'touch out' using their debit or credit card, taking less than a second, and avoiding the need to carry the correct change. The system will also allow First to offer a range of tickets including capping the daily fare. But unlike Oyster customers won't need to carry an additional card or worry about pre-payment or topping up. Customers using the contactless cards will simply see the cost of the fare deducted from their bank or credit card balance".

http://www.firstgroup.com/ukbus/bristol_bath/travel_news/news_initiatives/?item=2961&conf=0

Anonymous said...

They already do that in South Wales. It isues a ticket but that is automatic or at least when it works frequently the driver has to intervene as the card fails to work

THere are certainly no journey time savings with them. I would say 1 in 5 times they fail to work first time

Perhaps they need to look at the TfL sysyem that seems to work pretty reliably

Anonymous said...

Pete said:
"But unlike Oyster customers won't need to carry an additional card or worry about pre-payment or topping up. Customers using the contactless cards will simply see the cost of the fare deducted from their bank or credit card balance" "

Hmm, what First/Trent Barton sees as an advantage, I see as a major disadvantage - the problem with this is if you then don't get a receipt/ticket how do you verify all the transactions going through your bank account? Perhaps most people don't bother?! At least with Oyster you know how much is on the card and it auto-tops up when necessary. Much better.

Anonymous said...

Neither Trentbarton nor Oystercard are ITSO-compliant, which might just have something to do with their speed of operation....

Anonymous said...

Pete said; "I think the Trent Barton Mango system is the way to go, touching in and touching out with no passenger/driver interaction."

Oh great, lets get even further away from giving good customer service by encouraging drivers to ignore the passngers more than they already do!!! Lets face it, getting good quality driving staff who actually interact with the pax rather than just grunt or ignore them totally are rare enough as it is and I for one certainly wouldn't like to see anything introduced that gives the worst of the worst any means to get out of saying a simple "hello" or "goodbye"!!!!

Anonymous said...

To anon @ 0940...

trent barton train drivers to greet customers and say goodbye - and this actually happens with every customer - MANGO or no MANGO. Go and see for yourself...

Anonymous said...

Have the grumblers actually been on a Trent Barton bus? I have never encountered another operator which places as much emphasis on passenger-driver interaction as they do, smartcards or not! All the drivers greet passengers etc, they are made aware from the start of the recruitment process that the company considers this to be one of the most important aspects of their job.