Sunday, 19 February 2012

Commenting on Comments…

… or some of the Omnibuses Survey Results 2012

I read every single comment that comes through the Blogger comments system. The odd bit of spam creeps in (and I delete it as soon as possible) but generally Blogger is good at trapping spam—and in the process sometimes bona fide comments get caught.

Other than that, my policy is not to censor comments. I’ve withdrawn a couple of comments over the years, at the request of injured parties and on one occasion I felt compelled to delete the entire collection regarding Dash Coaches. I can’t edit out the bad so, on the two or three occasions where someone’s requested that I deal with potentially libellous or otherwise defamatory statements, I regret that the whole comment had to go.

Proportion of readers who work (or worked) in the bus industry

There’s been a certain amount of First-bashing, following my post on Cornwall tenders. It’s interesting how the far south west seems to attract attention perhaps disproportionate to its importance to the UK bus scene. People who express an opinion are always welcome here but I need to ask that you all do please remember that industry people read this (and this includes those at the periphery such as LTA employees, marketers, etc). Anything you say should be tempered with good nature. There are ways of saying something in a robust manner without causing offence.

For at least every two positive remarks about comments from those who took the time to take our 2012 reader survey there was about one on the negative side. Most people, most of the time, enjoy comments and feel that they add considerably to the blog. Some feel that the comments are the most important constituent. The recurrent theme regarding those who were less happy was along the lines of personal attacks and a lack of comment balance. I can live with an imbalance because we sometimes all have strong views to express. Regulars will no doubt have spotted that some blog posts here are deliberately prevocational in the first place!

As for personal attacks, these are few and mercifully far between. Here, we shouldn’t put up with them. As one respondent put it, “Some of the comments from readers… have become unnecessarily discourteous”. Discourtesy is unnecessary. There are others ways and means.

That said, we seem to be doing something right. The number of people who rate Omnibuses as “excellent” has increased year-on-year and is now at 63%. Add this to the 30% who view the blog as “very good” and that’s a very satisfactory 93%. The remainder felt Omnibuses was “good”. One person (not per cent) felt Omnibuses was “OK” and no one rated us poor.

I am sure that Comments contribute significantly to such a high rating.

More survey results will follow in due course.

14 comments:

Countrybus said...

I find both the articles and the comments informative, stimulating and sometimes controversial. The discussion on posts develops a theme further by virtue of coming from a wide range of contributors from differing backgrounds - industry and non-industry - even whilst meandering off on occasions down some unexpected but nonetheless intriguing byways.
So keep up the good work, keep the words flowing, keep the contributions rolling in - both blogger and commentator alike. Peter

John Smith said...

Is there a way to remove the 'Anonymous' option for comments? It makes it much easier to track conflicting opinions if people use separate names.

Doesn't have to be a real name, I've posted under pseudonyms here if my opinion doesn't reflect my employer, but discussions referring to "Anon 07:34" obscure the underlying meaning.

Yorkshireman said...

Good stuff. This blog is my first port of call in the morning.

I see the previous post on First/WGL now has 50 comments; just out of interest, which previous post attracted the most comments, and what was its subject?

Andi North said...

@Yorkshireman,

I believe that the post with the most comments was the recent post about First re-branding. I believe it got to 72 comments!

This blog is always the first thing I open when I load up my laptop. The posts are brilliant, but the comments keep me visiting the site two or three times a day!

Andi

Anonymous said...

I think the fact there is such variety in both the posts and comments reflects the broad readership and also the quality of the blog.

Anonymous said...

Pete says:

I suggest that people who want to be anonymous should at least use a name for the duration of the thread; as John Smith says, it makes it easier to trace a debate, and may even encourage debate. They can use different names on different days.

SEV 777 said...

I've also thought that Mr. Anonymous has been making too many comments. I fully understand that those employed in the industry may need a pseudonym but it certainly would make it easier to read the comments.

RAY.A said...

ionsuicHi Peter and Busing.Firstly quite agree with with all Peters comments,carry on blogging.Second Mr Busing I read your comments about the breadth of your readers and your hope that we take care as we are being watched.It seems this blog is fast becoming a barometer of current bus thinking.I can think of no better compliment to you and your readers.However I will continue to gently provoke as this sometimes stimulates people to think on their own rather than toeing their employer or political masters line.Kind regards Ray A.
PS CANNOT READ YOUR TWO TONE PASSWORDS.

Steve said...

Keep up the good work - better than much of the trade press and it's free!!

Busing said...

Thank you for these comments.

I think people use “Anonymous” because it’s just easier. Unless I force people to get a Google account, something that in itself will stifle commenting, I can’t bar “Anonymous” comments.

The post on First’s livery has attracted 84 comments and is, indeed, the most commented upon.

The two-tone “password” is a recently introduced Google “innovation” which I cannot alter.

John Smith said...

Thanks Busing. We don't need a Google account: if you could remove the "Anonymous" box then the Name/URL option allows us to pick a name for the day - much easier to track the discussion.

Anonymous said...

Call to axe free OAP bus travel

Pensioners should be stripped of free bus travel as part of £15 billion of immediate extra savings to boost the economy, a think-tank has said.

The Social Market Foundation said extra austerity measures projected for 2016/17 should be brought forward and the money ploughed into infrastructure.

Anonymous said...

Another Independent Bites the Dust

Go-Ahead Group is pleased to announced the forthcoming acquisition of Carousel Buses Limited, based in High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. The acquisition will take place on Saturday 3 March 2012.

cogidubnus said...

I agree the two-tone part of the password is almost unreadable...and tonight the black on white word is actually in greek characters which I can recognise, but my keyboard can't handle...here goes