Why would someone like Giles Fearnley want to take on a job heading up First UK Bus? The challenge, perhaps. Actually, it’s more than that. Had he not, Fearnley would’ve regretted it. Opportunities like this don’t surface every day.
It's now been eight months since his appointment. What progress, then, at First Bus? Like it or not, agree with it or not, Fearnley’s TV advertisement is at the very start of his trying to reposition First. It’ll be a hard slog. The advert itself certainly has its critics. May be it came out just that little bit too soon, for detractors compare the ad with reality and draw the inevitable conclusions.
The challenge certainly won’t be an overnight job. First, nevertheless, is encouraging its directors and managers to be a little more honest about the past, in the hope stakeholders will look forward to the future with more confidence. This starts with Fearnley himself and his implicitness about First’s history.
Hints emerging from First Bus are beginning to shed light on the developing process. One is about building a renewed brand. That’s already started, with the re-emergence of First Bus as an entity, an entity otherwise lost upon First gaining rail franchises from the mid-1990s. There are reportedly three buses secreted somewhere in West Yorkshire in three different potential new liveries that will form the core of this new identity. The management team is currently considering the strengths & weaknesses of each.
All three are reported as corporate in nature, bearing the name “First”. Apart from that, we have little detail. Except that it’s understood there’s room for localism to feature strongly alongside the corporate and we understand that local straplines will be given some prominence. It’s about getting the balance right.
So, this is the clearest indication yet of the direction of travel at First—it would seem that First will be refocusing more along Stagecoach than Go Ahead lines as the preferred delivery model. This, perhaps, is not surprising and even potentially a little disappointing. Yet, Fearnley is known to be impressed by the Stagecoach model. He will know that it delivers (nearly) every time.
Fearnley is also believed to be taking an holistic approach to services by considering putting mileage back as a means of developing rather than cutting networks. This also supports the sort of Stagecoach-preferred longer-term view. It’s widely believed that he will be giving back much more autonomy at the local level, the best place to understand individual and distinct markets. But, follow that argument through, and you actually find yourself adopting a Go Ahead stance.
To take an educational analogy, there’s likely to be no more strict headmasterly control, something long gone in the teaching sector. Rather, expect a less macho, more consensual approach.
Indications are that this genuinely looks a good time for First and I am sure its directors and managers view the future much more positively. Developing the education analogy, it’s a fact that a poor head will preside over an under-performing school. A cultural change at the top will result in the school turning around, for staff and for pupils. Those who work at First in recent years have often felt disappointed. They can now look forward more confidently and take great comfort in Fearnley’s headship. As can the pupils or, rather, customers.
Monday, 17 October 2011
The New Headmaster
Posted
Monday, October 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

32 comments:
I'm quite impressed with the First advertising campaign, which also includes local radio adverts and flyers in the local free rag where I live.
Surely the 'one national livery' approach must be right - you only have to look at GSC at the moment to see how many vehicles are in the 'wrong' livery to see all too easily how localism can cause problems - and I'm not talking about vehicles acquired from outside GSC or Go Ahead Group.
When I read the title "New Headmaster" I thought the blog article was going to be about the new transport minister replacing Philip Hammond!
Anonymous said...
When I read the title "New Headmaster" I thought the blog article was going to be about the new transport minister replacing Philip Hammond!
... or new school caretaker ...
Let's face it, anyone following on from ML is going to seem good.
Turning that ship around is going to take more than a few adverts.
Dream on!FIRST as a brand is too tarnished to remain.It needs a completely new brand name.
"Turning that ship around is going to take more than a few adverts."
True, but even before the recent changes at the top there has been much investment in new buses and driver training (Green drive, which makes the ride much more comfy as well as more fuel efficient) and customer care. First was getting better under ML but progress is accelerating. Despite Firt's bad image 80% of WY bus users are happy with the servicie according to Passenger Focus. First has suffered overmuch from PTE spin. It remains true that First has someway to go but it is going!
'Surely the 'one national livery' approach must be right - you only have to look at GSC at the moment to see how many vehicles are in the 'wrong' livery to see all too easily how localism can cause problems - and I'm not talking about vehicles acquired from outside GSC or Go Ahead Group.'
I tend to agree; while the 'local' image can be a good thing, I certainly don't like the Trent/Go North East idea of a different livery for every route; this is a recipe for confusion when the inevitable substitutions occur. I think the 'national-company with-local-slant' gives the right impression of stability combined with responsiveness; after all, what were BET and THC liveries but corporate identity with local taglines?
While certainly not an apologist for First, I would like to see them step up to the mark; not least to give Stagecoach Northants (whose performance since transferring from the East to Midlands area has deteriorated noticeably) some proper competition. I hope Giles makes the company a better one.
Mel Durrant said...
"I think the 'national-company with-local-slant' gives the right impression of stability combined with responsiveness; after all, what were BET and THC liveries but corporate identity with local taglines?"
I don't think that's quite correct regarding the BET and THC images. THC had a small range of standard liveries (red or green, plus the coaching and Midland General group individual liveries), but the local fleetnames were prominent - certainly not just local taglines. BET did have a couple of standard colours, but virtually every subsidiary had its own livery or combination of colours, and, like the THC group, their own fleetnames. To the best of my knowledge, the vehicles carried no indication of the corporate ownership. The National Bus Company approach was more corporate, with a limited range of standard liveries (similar to THC), and the local fleetnames remained prominent, but with the addition of the corporate symbol. However, the local names - Hants & Dorset, Bristol, Ribble, etc, were to the fore - still, definitely not just taglines. From my recollection, it was these local names that the general public knew and related to.
To my mind, the current GoAhead approach has more in common with the NBC approach, which keeps names like Plymouth Citybus and Wilts & Dorset in the forefront, while retaining an acknowledgement that the operator is part of a larger group. This approach could work with a single livery as well, or perhaps a smaller range of liveries (a la NBC and THC), as well as with individual liveries. It is the local names that are important - I suspect that the public are used to operators having buses in different colours now - but make the local names big and bold!
" I certainly don't like the Trent/Go North East idea of a different livery for every route; this is a recipe for confusion when the inevitable substitutions occur."
Fair point, and it takes effort to avoid this happening. I don't know about Go North East, but Trent Barton very seldom use a vehicle in the wrong livery for substitution. When substitutions are required, it's normally a vehicle in standard red livery carrying a correct colour slip board, not a wrong colour vehicle from another route. I won't say it never happens, but it's rare.
I'll also acknowledge that Transpeak often has Notts & Derby vehicles, as well as Trent Barton red ones, but there's obviously a particular policy in place with that route.
I was maybe over-simplifying, RC169, and I take your point. I agree with what you say about the Go-Ahead approach generally (North-East excepted). If First go for a fleet livery in a limited amount of variations, plus a local, easily-indentifiable (and easy-to-identify-with) fleetname for individual companies, that would be a good way forward.
Anon at 1110; yes, route-specific branding does require effort. My local company, Stagecoach Northants has many individually branded routes. When the company was under the aegis of Stagecoach East, this worked very well and 'wrong' vehicles were rare. However, since SC Midlands took control about 18 months ago this has deteriorated (along with other aspects of operation) so that route-branded vehicles can, and usually do, appear anywhere. Which causes great confusion, especially if several branded routes pass a particular stop.
From the images I've seen, I personally like the design(s), but it's executed badly at the front in particular. Another example of the livery not following the lines of the bus; it appears to have been designed with the Wrightbus family in mind at the front and fits well with them, but other buses such as the Alexander ALX range look dreadful. It appears they're focusing on similar colours as the current ones but slightly more blueish more like the current local website colours. It is indeed corporate style and will be identical for each region except for the name on the side, including the colours. Unless they drastically change the design before it gets rolled out of course, it's still not final yet as already mentioned.
Finally, people are seeing sense and are not frightened to confirm what the industry has known for a long time - ML was a control freak who presided over a mediocre business with arguably the worst reputation by far of the big 5. There are some very good senior managers in the organisation who have been stifled for too long - and First may now be able to attract staff from other groups who had hitherto shied away from the culture of micro management from Aberdeen.
A brand is derived from experiences a consumer gets from the product in question.
You can't change a brand if you haven't changed the product experience to some degree.
And that's more than just redsigning a livery.
"Trent Barton very seldom use a vehicle in the wrong livery for substitution."
That's made easier when your allocations are such that one bus does one route all day. In smaller towns or areas of lower frequencies this isn't possible, and at that point it looks silly.
So by all means route-brand when, like Trent, you can keep things in the right place - but definitely *don't* if your allocations aren't 100%.
As for First, I think they should design something that would be a recognisable livery style but could be applied in different local colours, as the Stagecoach livery sometimes is.
Maybe Stenning could help? :)
With ML out of the way (long overdue) there is at least some hope for the new management and Giles is an excellent choice.
To me, it seems eminently sensible to follow the Stagecoach model. That operation smacks of total quality across virtually all divisions - the general presentation of every bus on service, and the quality and appearance of their drivers, is something most operators could do with copying - First particularly.
"To me, it seems eminently sensible to follow the Stagecoach model. That operation smacks of total quality across virtually all divisions - the general presentation of every bus on service, and the quality and appearance of their drivers, is something most operators could do with copying - First particularly."
Agree. Stagecoach seem to be far and away better than the competition in just about every way.
I can't help but think that First need to spend more time putting back the lost late evening/early morning mileage and less time painting their buses magenta.
I like the look of the new trial liveries, but I'd like the last bus from town to my parents' house to be slightly later than 2230. Especially as it was 2330 until not so very long ago...
Most people do not care about the bus livery and are not even interested in it. Only the bus companies get hung up on it.
The passengers would prefer clean and reliable buses and good services rather than endless money wasted on re branding and route branding which in many cases becomes daft because the buses end up on other routes.
All the passenger need is proper destination blinds something that most companiesd find difficult to imposible to achieve.
Hoe often do you see a bus with a piece of paper stuck in the windscreen with the route number on it because there is no blind or it is not working?
Anon at 08:35 wrote: "Hoe often do you see a bus with a piece of paper stuck in the windscreen with the route number on it because there is no blind or it is not working?"
Not very often at all. Sorry!
Anonymous (comment 18) is mistaken about liveries and route branding.
Existing customer’s value the quality of service, but existing customers do not last for ever. A smart livery if backed by good service helps win over new customers, preventing decline. Sloppy route branding brings down a company image, but if well done like Trent is immensely useful to new and occasional customers. Occasional customers are important, I may only use (say) Nottingham buses twice a decade, but thousands of people like me visit Nottingham every year and collectively we are important to profit margins and viability.
To reiterate my point earlier, I think it's necessary to distinguish between livery and operator/fleet name. It is the name that people need to know when phoning to enquire about a bus time (unless they risk Traveline!), or indeed when they want to complain. The liveries are changed frequently, overall advertising dilutes the impact of a corporate scheme - but I think passengers are aware of that. Anon @ 08:35 makes a valid point relating to destination displays.
As far as liveries are concerned, some German operators seem to have the overall advert as the standard livery. You could try looking at the photos of trams 271 - 279 on this page:-
http://www.nahverkehr-breisgau.de/bilder_Combinos.html
and try to deduce what the fleet livery is! OK, numbers 281-290 will give you a better idea, but some of those now have overall ads (I saw at least one this morning!), and, in the meantime, there is a new 'standard' livery. The Freiburg city buses are a little better, but these people have a range of liveries on display:_
http://www.nahverkehr-breisgau.de/SBG.html
Helpfully for passengers, the current bus liveries of both operators appears to be the same plain overall red!
The customer's perception of a business is most likely to be linked to the name of that business, and although I have preferences regarding liveries, from a commercial perspective, I'm sure the name is more important.
David said...
I like the look of the new trial liveries, but I'd like the last bus from town to my parents' house to be slightly later than 2230. Especially as it was 2330 until not so very long ago...
17 October, 2011 16:28
There needs to be an injection of realism here. How many people was the 23:30 carrying on a regular basis? If it was a profitable operation, it would still be running. The colour of the bus and evening frequencies are totally separate arguments which cannot be linked in any way. 21st century bus companies are businesses, be they owned by First, Stagecoach, Trentbarton or anyone else.
"Anon at 08:35 wrote: "Hoe often do you see a bus with a piece of paper stuck in the windscreen with the route number on it because there is no blind or it is not working?"
Not very often at all. Sorry!"
When I see it it's normally cowboy independents, not the big groups.
Neil
"As far as liveries are concerned, some German operators seem to have the overall advert as the standard livery."
TPG in Geneva seem to use a different approach - buses seem to stay in the livery they were introduced in.
Neil
@ viewfromthesouth
There needs to be an injection of realism here. How many people was the 23:30 carrying on a regular basis? If it was a profitable operation, it would still be running.
It comes down to what a "profitable operation" actually means.
Was it carrying enough passengers as a stand-alone service to break even? Probably not, no, there was typically 15-20 passengers on it on a Friday or Saturday night, 12 of whom were probably concessionary fare holders.
But is the *network* of buses in West Yorkshire profitable? Damn right it is, and the network as a whole is what tempts people into buying the lucrative period tickets.
For me, that last bus- being able to have a few jars and get the bus home when I'm done- was the financial deal-breaker between buying a First day ticket and using my car all day instead. I'm not going to buy a day ticket only to have to get my wife or mother to come out and get me from the pub- I'm going to use my car instead. So that bus being pulled is the difference between me being a First customer and me not being a First customer. I doubt that I'm alone in this.
As for being realistic, Bradford has a population of over 500,000 with hardly any buses after 2300; many last buses are around 2220-2245 and First seem to move the last buses forward by 10 minutes at every timetable change. In contrast, Oxford has a population of 150,000 yet has a strong Nightbus network operated by Stagecoach. Newcastle/Gateshead has a similar population and has a strong Nightbus network operated by Go North East.
You are lucky to have buses running that late. In many parts of the UK the bus services are down to an infrequent skeleton service on a few main routes after 7pm.
People are not going to use buses when services are that poor. They will stick to going by car.
The bus companies have to raise their game very considerably. They are not competative at all with the alternatives so they are stuck with about 70% concessionary pass holders and an assorted colection of other passengers many just using the services infrequently
All First Bus are doing is the typical corporate window dressing. The product itself is still sub standard and unchanged
"many parts of the UK the bus services are down to an infrequent skeleton service on a few main routes after 7pm."
This is hardly surprising when (a) there is a recession (b)costs continue to rise steeply (c)cash-strapped local authorities are cutting subsidies and (d) in April BSOG is cut 20%
It's no use resoning that an extra four or five hours operation isn't going to cost a lot...potentially it is...retaining an evening service in a loss making situation involves not only finding an extra four or five hours pay for the drivers directly involved, but also the supervisory staff and the engineering staff...
Taken all in all, and leaving aside the more heavily urbanised areas, it can easily be enough to drag a worthwhile commercial route into loss.
The arguments going on now remind me very much of those at deregulation/privatisation when central government and many local authorities openly rejoiced in huge reductions in "wasteful subsidy" then six months later wondered where all the benefits of co-ordinated services, connections, comprehensive publicity, expensive ticketing interavailability, large enquiry offices and centres had suddenly gone...and then a year or so after that, when a lot of optimistic amateurs had packed it in, where a lot of the services had gone...
In an age where everything has to be properly costed, someone has to pay - in these cases who pays? The taxpayer? The Council Taxpayer? The Customer? Or are you going to simply dump the whole thing back on the Bus Company who will simply withdraw the service after 7.30pm?
It would be nice to think that council franchising or a return to direct local authority control would make a huge difference.
Frankly though who is seriously going to trust local authorities and politicians who in response to 20% cuts in bus funding, make cuts of 40%, 45%, 50% or even 100%, whilst still propping up pet projects...
Last week the usual glossy self-congratulatory paperback dropped through my door...from a council ostensibly in crisis, boasting about planting ornamental trees and "beautifying" our town centre with a piece of highly expensive (one-off commissioned) statuary...At a time when they're cutting back on services, I felt like spitting...
This debate seems to have moved on to evening services, and having been a driver working late shifts for many years I feel qualified to comment.
It is very true to say that having a late bus home from town is the deal breaker for many passengers when it comes to buying a day or longer period ticket. Unfortunately where there is a parallel train service that mode will nearly always win on length of operating day, and often on price too, making the evening bus harder to run commercially.
For shorter town trips in particular the passenger flows have altered significantly over the last decade or so. In the early 90s a typical evening would entail taking a few commuters and cleaning ladies home after 7, and bringing the cinema or pub goers into town at about 8. Then after 9 bingo would chuck out and provide some mid evening traffic before the pubs all shut at 11, and the cinema and theatre goers all wanted to go home on last buses, providing good full buses.
Roll forward to 2011, and at 7 we still take commuters home, but most of the cleaners now seem to work in out of town office complexes or drive themselves. The trade into town is also less, as entertainment is also out of town locations at Multiplexes which are built with the car in mind. Passengers into town for their social life tend to travel in over a much longer period - at 2200 we are still carrying people into town for a night out. There's no bingo rush now, and the last buses at 2330 or midnight are very quiet as most revellers are still at their venues. There probably would be trade at 0200 (hence the successful nightbus networks in cities like Southampton and Brighton) but in most towns the slow trade from 1900 until 'chuck out time' coupled with the perceived hassle of carrying drunks means that running late buses just isn't lucrative enough.
First at its best in Aberdeen. A yellow school bus out on normal service with sticker in the fron window.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41987105@N06/6034503761/in/photostream
Until recently this was a regular occurrence, coaches also used, no destination screens only stickers.
The coaches and yellow chool buses do not have ticket machines fitted to them, resulting in no fares being taken.
Anon at 2213, that's not a great example.
For a start, as has been mentioned, it's actually relatively rare to see paper blinds like this on balance, and it is usually independent cowboys.
In that photo, it's probably one of the best "paper blinds" I've ever seen. Nicely printed, clear to see and stuck in a promient position - couldn't fault it. The bus is also respectiable inside, it's not like they've used an absolute heap in place of a nice bus.
You mention that they don't have ticket machines meaning they have to give free rides. Surely, this is one of the best things a company can do to please passengers and give them a nice surprise?! Who's going to complain they didn't have to pay?
Re anon 08:45
Agree that this example is not the worst.
However, since January of this year First Aberdeen has been short of vehicles and has had to resort to putting yellow school buses and coaches out on service.
No lost mileage but lost revenue because of no ticket machines on the vehicles. Fine for the passenger but not so good for the finances of the company!
Post a Comment