Should be bus industry be deregulated? Yes, I know that it is already. Should it see fewer regulations, then.
Thus far, the few respondents to the government’s recently launched Red Tape Challenge seem to want to see more regulation, not less.
Yesterday, the government added a road transport category to its growing list of activities where it wishes to see fewer regulations. Here is an ideal opportunity for operators and others to suggest how red tape might be cut. Rather than the trivial responses we see to date, might someone consider something more meaty?
The truth is, however, that even though the bus industry is already “deregulated”, we still need regulation. By that I mean basic ground rules. An anarchic free-for-all without any form of constraint at all would be like a game of football without match officials—impossible to manage, deteriorating by the second, and certainly of no worth whatsoever to its spectators.
When the present government was elected, we asked readers for their unnecessary regulations they’d prefer to see scrapped, bus wise. Check them out here
i Road transport challenge
Saturday, 21 May 2011
Should we Deregulate?
Posted
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

4 comments:
what then are the basic ground rules that are mentioned as being needed?
safety and vehicle maintenance for starters, some sort of guaranteed continuity of service provision, driver licencing, and so on ...
Government wise this is an exercise in cost cutting.Hope they they dont prune VOSA or the traffic commissioners too severely.I hope the indian signs are wrong or there will be chaos.
I agree with Neil's commment on the related entry to this posting regarding removing barriers to entry to encourage new operators to try hailed DRT / shared taxi on a true, 100% flexible basis. I wonder if 8 seaters could bring flexible bus service to smaller towns where the low population density, does not generate sufficient demand for conventional services.
Post a Comment