The expansion of higher education has provided bus operators with an opportunity to develop some attractive, bespoke student bus services, often in partnership with universities & colleges themselves. New halls of residence can no longer easily be accommodated on campus, even assuming they could in the first place. And, increasingly, teaching buildings are scattered, too.
It was ironic that yesterday I answered a plea from my grand-son by delivering over some distance his pushbike. No, I didn’t ride it there. He’d apparently been using the student bus service for a week and was fed up with it. He’d requested private transport. At least he’d held firm on the decision to keep his pre-historic supermini at home, recognising that private, fossil fuel-powered transport is a considerable drain on student finance.
I dutifully arrived with said bike, asking him what was going on. Two issues:
- The bus was too expensive. The fare didn’t represent value for money. Thanks to his research via Facebook, he’d also learnt that some peers scattered elsewhere in England were paying less than he was.
- His local peers who’d chosen to cycle, though occasionally getting wet, were often completing their journeys faster than those by bus. This was because, at key peak times, you usually had to queue & wait at both ends, as the first vehicle to arrive was full. This meant the journey was not only protracted, there was no guarantee you would arrive when you intended to. Or you had to get up earlier (bit of a problem for students!). The operator simply didn’t provide enough peak time capacity.
Annual Student Ticket Prices:
Bath (First): £249; Bristol (First): £367 ; Exeter (Stagecoach): £250; Leeds (First): £312; Leicester (Arriva): £280; Leicester (First): £290; Liverpool (Stagecoach): £200; Manchester (Arriva): £271; Manchester (Stagecoach): £175; Newcastle (Stagecoach): £225; Portsmouth (First): £220; Southampton (First): £220; Tyneside: (Arriva): £450; York (First): £240; Yorkshire (Arriva): £453.

11 comments:
The Bristol price is a joke, yes?! First should be ashamed of themselves.
Ah yes, but it's Wessex Connect who povide the main transport for UWE in Bristol?
Greater Norwich (First): rising from £180 to £190 on November 1st.
Complete First Eastern Counties Network (what's left of it): rising from £325 to £340 at same time - both tickets available to UEA staff as well as students.
Indeed it is the Ulink network that serves both UWE & Bristol Uni. First only has ONE service directly aimed at students, the long standing 70. A ULink pass is £279 for a years unlimited travel.
For university students in Nottingham the prices are:
Nottingham City Transport: £199
Trent Barton: £189
Quite a bit cheaper than the prices of the big companies!
Nottingham City Transport: £199
Trent Barton: £189
Quite a bit cheaper than the prices of the big companies!
But expensive if you should need both!
First Essex (Colchester): Unicard for Colchester network (for use on First only) is £139 for students and staff.
Colchester Boroughcard available to the public and also offering travel on Network Colchester's network is a whopping £560!
Those prices are very high!!!
In Aberystwyth an annaul AHA Card (Bus Pass) costs just £40 for the Arriva network! Although I believe this is subsidised somewhat by the University.
http://www.aberguild.co.uk/en/your-union/news/1-latest-news/162-ar-hyd-aber-free-and-discounted-student-bus-travel
http://www.aber.ac.uk/en/maps-travel/bus/aha/
There is a very big difference between the various networks that have been mentioned so far. Arriva's offer in Aberystwyth is not exactly on the same terms as those in Bristol or Nottingham.
There are also differences between the universities, both in terms of the amount of funding that they are able to put in (a repidly dwindling resource), the location of halls of residence in relation to a main campus, and the number of students who live at home or away from halls and campus. This has a major bearing on the amount of traffic that is generated and where it goes and therefore its effect on a route network.
What is the big difference?
Is it the size of the route network?
To Anonymous 06Oct@1438 from Anonymous 05Oct@2102.
The difference is not just the size of the network but the resources needed to run it and the income received. Where you have a university campus that is largely self-contained then it is possible to have a route, or possibly routes, to cater for that single traffic objective. Where you have a situation, such as in Bristol, where there are two universities and several other institutions, with facilities spread around the city, bus resources cannot be so concentrated. Therefore the cost of providing bus services is higher and passengers must pay more.
Post a Comment