Last week, First may have officially launched its Temsa Avenue lighter weight bus in Bradford, where it will undergo a six month evaluation, but perhaps the most important area for such re-engineered technology is in the far south west.
Over recent years, First’s investment in its Devon & Cornwall subsidiary has lagged. Managing director Marc Reddy has managed to persuade the First UK Bus board of the need to invest but it’s been geographically patchy and reliant on cascaded though some relatively new stock. The other side of the coin, in reducing its fleet age profile, is the steady reduction in mileage and PVR, as First especially in Cornwall slims down. Older vehicles get scrapped.
Perhaps the Temsa Avenue is akin to the Bristol SUL and Bristol LH of old. These two buses occupied a high proportion of the Western National fleets of the 1970s and 1980s and were particularly suited to the operating environment in which they found themselves. The narrow-bodied Plaxton Supreme bodied LH coach seated about the same number as the Avenue. Back then, their main failings were (a) a lack of capacity on occasion and (b) short operating life. The latter was a function of its lightweight nature. The former is less of an issue these days, even in the free travel honeypots of Cornwall.
And there’s the proverbial rub. Going lightweight eventually brings with it an additional vehicle replacement cost. But that’s exactly why First should be using those vehicles in the south west. Operating a bus at one ton’s worth of lighter weight, in a market such as the far south west, would bring with it instant benefits, where there are fewer demands on buses making service. By that, I mean fewer all day 18-hour commitments, compared to urban operations. It’s conceivable that a lighter weight bus such as the Avenue might suit its environment that much better than in an intense operation in urban Bradford. In Bradford, there’s still a trade off between lighter weight and the robustness of a heavyweight bus such as the Volvo B6RLE. You can depend upon Volvos day in and day out, and night in and night out, for reliability and regularly over long periods.
Meanwhile, what is First’s trial trying to achieve?
- It will allow First to gain operational experience of lighter weights.
- First will better understand the trade off or balances between the revenue expenditure savings of a light weight against capital expenditure of a more conventional, perhaps longer-lasting heavy weight.
- Undoubtedly, it will challenge the UK sector to come up with lighter weight composite buses, including those with traditional heavyweight chassis.
Take a look at First’s largest Cornish competitor, Western Greyhound. There’s definitely an operational fuel penalty now that Greyhound is at last investing in heavier low floors. Heavier than conventional minis, that is. The fuel inefficiency of its 23 Optare Solos compared to blighter Vario O814s they have replaced will be only too apparent.

11 comments:
The challenge is surely to reduce the weight but not the durability. Bristol/ECW managed this to some extent, and so did the Routemaster; but since that generation of vehicles, designers seem to have lost sight of this objective.
Of course, in some operational circumstances light duty was perfectly satisfactory, and some Bedford OBs, and Bristol LHs later on, lasted for many years. Quite a lot of Bristol SUs survive in preservation, and some had useful 'second lives' - and Western National found that they needed to adapt their maintenance procedures to suit the lighter vehicles - including reduced servicing intervals. This, of course, has a cost penalty, but did improve relibility, and may be worthwhile in the longer term. Whether current accounting practices would see it that way is another question!
Surely many Alexander Dennis products are already lighter than the rival products from Volvo and Scania - the Pointer Dart whilst deemed a midibus had up to 43 seats and has managed well over a dozen years service in many places.
Today AD still market the E200, E300 and E400 as lighter (hence more fuel efficient) than their rivals. As a matter of interest, how does the weight of the Temsa compare with an E300?
"Today AD still market the E200, E300 and E400 as lighter (hence more fuel efficient) than their rivals."
That they might, but they offer a visibly (and audibly, with all the rattles and squeaks) worse environment for the passenger than the weightier Wrights and Citaros (the latter being the real benchmark for quality). The real challenge is to make a lightweight bus that actually offers the passenger something that isn't a distress purchase.
I note the image shows a left hand drive,three door model. What spec will the First ones be ?
Regarding weight versus fuel economy, surely fully automatic vehicles are to blame ? Why not try semi-auto versions. Most car drivers know manuals get more miles per litre than autos.
As an ex Bradfordian I can see the reasoning behind the decision to try out the Avenue in my home town. Bradford was traditionally a double deck town, and even when part of WYPTE Metro, Yorkshire Rider and in to Bradford Traveller (Badgerline) days only a small number of Mercedes 709's broke the double deck deadlock. Since 1998 Bradford has received only heavyweight vehicles both single and double deck plus a number of Optare Solo's whereas Leeds Halifax Huddersfield and York all received Volvo B6 or Dennis Darts in their deliveries.
It suggests to me that First are expecting the Avenue to be a "light" heavyweight returning better mpg from a bus that stands comparison with their predominately Wright bodied single deck fleet. it will be interesting to see if after the six months trial, they transfer the bus to Halifax where they can compare it with their sizeable fleet of Dennis darts.
This bus is utter crap to start with,
here is pic to help prove this http://arrivane.fotopic.net/p65254830.html
It doesn't strike me that the bus is that suited to narrow roads - it's 8 foot 4 wide (which would disqualify it from most routes over here in Jersey), and at 39 foot long it's going to struggle with tight turns.
I'm not sure that light weight necessariy means short life. Some of the original Carlyle Darts felt really lightweight - they rattled all over the place and it seemed like it was only the glass in the windows holding them together, but there are a few 20 year old examples still gong strong with local operators in my area.
Agreed that FDC is pretty awful, and gets worse the closer you get Lands End.
What is noteworthy, though, is Western Greyhound, now larger than First in Cornwall (and deservedly so) appears to have standardised on Citaros for their large single deck bus, when, with Truro P&R for example they could have opted for lightweight E300s.
"Western Greyhound, now larger than First in Cornwall (and deservedly so) appears to have standardised on Citaros for their large single deck bus, when, with Truro P&R for example they could have opted for lightweight E300s."
I'm not sure, but I think that the park and ride citaros are specified by cornwall council.
What is interesting is that there are so few full size single decks in Cornwall - they are probably quite limited by some of the roads.
"I'm not sure, but I think that the park and ride citaros are specified by cornwall council."
Maybe, but since then WG have acquired another and have one more on order. Agreed though that 12m single decks are quite restricted on where they can go. 10.7m Darts tend to be the maximum "go anywhere" size in Cornwall.
Post a Comment