Thursday, 6 May 2010

Musical Chairs

You can’t help wondering whether Transdev London United and Transdev Yellow Buses got the better deal in yesterday’s round of musical chairs. Time, of course, will tell.

As some predicted in the early new year, both TYB and London United (plus the NSL Services business formerly owned by NCP that transferred to London Sovereign) pass to RĂ©gie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP), the French state-owned company responsible for operating much of Paris’ public transport. This is a condition of the merger of Veolia and Transdev. RATP has given up its 25 per cent stake in Transdev in exchange for the outright acquisition of the two former Transdev assets (and others, in Europe).

One wonders, therefore, whether others have perhaps come off less well. The rump of London Sovereign and the former Blazefield companies continue within the new Transveolia combine, together with Veolia’s existing subsidiaries in south Wales and elsewhere. To a high degree, their futures now depend upon which management management style surfaces, whether this has a Transdev or, as suggested, a Veolia focus. On the other hand, it may be that poorer performing current Veolia subsidiaries could find a much-needed elping hand. Given Blazefield's perhaps at the opposite extreme to Veloia, the bolting together of these businesses does seem unnatural, with one arm potentially weighing down the other. And the split means a loss of current and future economies of scale.

In terms of scale, it seems short-sighted to split London United and London Sovereign into distinct operators. It might, however, have a marginally positive impact on competition for TfL contracts.

Also yesterday, of the possibility of consolidations involving National Express, new chief executive Dean Finch stated, “I don't see any compelling logic why there should be any other consolidation [than Arriva’s]. NatEx is not looking to buy rivals, we’re focused on the current business.” Hmmm. NatEx may have rebuffed both First & Stagecoach for the time being but I’m not sure I’d rule out further consolidations. As for being in a position to buy, has NatEx recovered sufficiently, anyway?

Underlying NatEx’s weakness was the revelation that a third of NatEx’s 1,900 buses are VORed for repairs each day, compared to a norm of nearer 10 than 20 per cent. Quite an overhead to carry. Finch stated he was to take direct control of his business to remedy such matters. More positively, NatEx reported that its coach & rail businesses have done well in repatriating people following the Icelandic volcano eruption, with an extra 12,000 journeys. He did not rule out further job cuts, though.

5 comments:

Peter said...

That NatEx effectively has to have 33% spares in their bus businesses is truly shocking. Quite honestly, I'm surprised NatEx didn't go under ages ago on this basis. How on earth could the business have been allowed to get in such a state?

Stevie D said...

It would be a criminal waste of effort if the superb reputation and following that Blazefield divisions have built up is allowed to be ripped to shreds by the cold, dead hand of Veolia management. Let's just hope to God it doesn't happen - although I'm sure that Northern Rail and First Transpennine would be delighted...

Anonymous said...

It's worse than that Peter - I make it 50% spares if 33% are always off the road. No wonder they still have a few Metrobuses knocking around. The question is, are they making service so do the have sufficient vehicles for that level of chaos, or when he's sorted it out, will they be selling 25% of their fleet?!!!

Anonymous said...

Time for a visit from the local VOSA team perhaps ?

Mind you, NatEx engineering staff must be busy bunnies.Perhaps though,it is the same 1900 vehicles coming back in, day after day. Now if that standard of work is being applied to their railway rolling stock....

Anonymous said...

NatEx engineering staff must be busy bunnies.

Or not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!