What’s the difference between a trolleybus and a brassiere? Nothing. Both are underwired, both are supportive infrastructure, both are practical & fashionable at the same time and the effect of both can be quite electrifying. And both come in pairs, if like in Leeds the trolley is articulated.
Is it me or do I sense that planners dislike the humble bus and will only ever allow the bus to make a major contribution to congestion unless it’s disguised as something else.
Build a guided busway or provide other dedicated track (e.g. Swansea FTR) and you have a “scheme” that planners can get behind. Don't call it a bus but disguise it as something more up market. Such grand designs then have potential, they’re perceived differently and above all can attract the middle classes. Unlike the bus.
And so it is with the now fashionable Leeds trolleybus (itself given a rather nice scheme-like name, New Generation Transport). Basically, the tram failed and the bus wasn’t seen as quite good enough. Enter the trolleybus. Trolleybuses lend themselves a sense of permanence (no sudden overnight route changes). They’re different. Indeed, they are to commuting what yellow buses are to schools. In West Yorkshire, you’ll soon see both. Are yellow buses just another disguise? Paint a brand new school bus yellow and you suddenly have a product the CBI can get behind. Yet, any other school bus can bring similar benefits if managed correctly.
Having got that off my chest (ahem, back to bras?), I applaud Metro, the West Yorkshire PTE, for the success in gaining trolley funding. It will come as no surprise to readers that I am fond of them. Clean (at least at the point of delivery), quiet, smooth (assuming the roads are in good order) and swift, very swift. There’s a lot to commend them. Coupled with improvements in traffic signal technology to form “virtual” bus lanes plus actual segregation, Leeds has a product that’s likely to reduce highway capacity on the one hand but, through modal shift, improve highway capacity on the other.
Bravo to Leeds. Even if the trolleys will be articulated. Now, what about the rest of England? Forget the catenary, just let’s have some free roadspace so that the humble bus can become destigmatised and play a real role...
Tuesday, 23 March 2010
Underwired
Posted
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

7 comments:
You could also make the trolleybuses yellow (with a couple of maroon bands, complete with green lining out)... What more could you ask for?
I suspect that in this image-conscious (perhaps that should be 'image-obsessed') age anything new has to be, and look, significantly different in order to attract any interest, even if the 'new' aspects don't actually bring any real practical benefits. Of course, in the case of trolleybuses, the 'new' aspects do bring benefits, as you say - cleanliness, quietness, acceleration - all of which, I suggest, would go some way to meeting the objections of those who do not use buses.
The downside is the cost of the infrastructure and vehicles, the inflexibility, and the impact on the streetscene. Interesting (or perhaps not) that in the image you have used, the overhead wires are hardly visible - I think the reality is a rather different. Whether the cost-benefit analysis will favour trolleybuses again remains to be seen. Some of the benefits do not lend themselves to being easily 'valued', which will probably not help the case for trolleybuses, but the costs for atmospheric pollution, in particular, may be charged in other ways in the future, which may give trolleybuses a better chance.
RC169 said
"Interesting (or perhaps not) that in the image you have used, the overhead wires are hardly visible - I think the reality is a rather different."
Indeed. I can't get excited by trams or trolleybuses. The obvious downside is their innate inflexibilty and almost as significant in my mind is the copious amount of ugly infrastructure that is required everywhere the trams/trolleys go. Tramlines also bring the additional danger to pedestrians from the tracks buried in the road, particularly to ladies wearing heels. Any trip to Manchester includes a rather irritating soundtack from tram drivers' liberal use of horns (warranted or not, I make no comment!).
At the end of the day Councils are drawn towards tram and trolley systems as they're seen as 'trendy', they can be seen to be 'doing something' and it's something further that they can 'control'.
Build a guided busway or provide other dedicated track (e.g. Swansea FTR) and you have a “scheme” that planners can get behind. Don't call it a bus but disguise it as something more up market. Such grand designs then have potential, they’re perceived differently and above all can attract the middle classes. Unlike the bus.
There is of course one significant issue. A busway, or a tram track is infrastructure and counts as capital expenditure. A bus is not and doesn't - it's a running cost. The rules on how you finance the two are radically different - unless you go the PFI "design build and operate" route, but these days that's been exposed as a huge scam against the taxpayer.
Guided busways...just an expensive way to make a flexible travel concept inflexible.They just increase wear on bus tyres.The hugely delayed and over budget Huntingdon scheme is soon to be followed by the Gosport-Fareham scheme,no doubt.
Light rail every time for me...which is seen as more acceptable to most sections of society,and usually grows usage far more than any bus network.
I completely agree with you - buses are seen as drab and dull and from a past age. Planners like high profile projects that make a big visual impact - because sadly we live in a short-termist age where the initial impact is considered more important than the sustainability or long-term effects.
That's why we get stupid schemes like the misguided busways and the ftr, when conventional high-quality buses on ordinary roads with bus lanes and priority schemes would achieve at least as much (if not more), for a far lower cost.
We haven't had a serious interurban busway in this country before so don't condemn the Cambridge scheme before it even starts. Lets see how it works. The fact that it's late and over budget has nothing to do with it being busway. The same thing could, and probably would, have happened it had been built as a tramway or railway. The Edinburgh tramway construction hasn't been without its problems.
As regards trolleybuses, don't overlook the "sparks effect". I was in Montreux last year and our holiday rep advised us to use the "electric buses". So ordinary people do notice the difference.
Trolleybuses on the Cambridge busway would surely have had an appeal although stringing overhead wires through the historic city might have been a struggle. Scope for some form of hybrid?
Paul
There is no difference between a trolleybus and a brassiere...they both carry the fallen masses...
Post a Comment