A very interesting graph appeared in a recent edition of routeONE magazine. It shows bus sales over the period 1975-2008. Although the Gen1 minibus is missing, it nevertheless offers quite an incite into our industry and how manufacturing output mirrors on-the-ground operations (quite logically, of course). We do what routeONE did not—take a canter through the years.
- The period 1975 to 1977 saw a modest rise in the number of buses built. Note the dominance of the single deck (green area) but very healthy double deck sales. All this was on the back of the successful New Bus Grant. Influencing single deck purchases was partly in response to the National Bus Company buying the Leyland National, out of necessity (company mantra) and need (no longer requiring double decks in quite the same quantity).
- By 1979, sales dropped to 1975 levels.
- There was a steep climb to 1980. Why? The New Bus Grant, in existence from 1969 to modernise fleets was in 1980 about in be cut in half, with further reductions in the years to its phase out, in 1985. This resulted in a rush.
- After 1980, the industry cut its orders back sharply. This was a time of recession (1980-2)Note, however, that while double decks certainly fell, single deck orders dived. This was the era of MAP during which time NBC, Scottish Bus Group and some municipals re-evaluated their needs, realised they could reduce their PVR by operating deckers—and ordering accordingly.
- After 1983/4’s two years of modest growth, the manufacturing sector all but collapsed, as the uncertainties of the soon-to-be deregulated operating market took over.
- The industry reached its low point in 1987 when, apart from not shown minibuses, few vehicles were manufactured.
- The climb out of the pit started soon after. It was hesitant. 1989 was a better year but uncertainties continued and the market again dropped away.
- As operators realised that Gen1 minibuses were unable to cope with peak loadings, there came the birth of the midibus (red area). By 1989, this was significantly the largest vehicle length/size being delivered.
- The period to 1992 saw orders fall again. Newly privatised operators were not in a strong enough position to bulk order, some were extending existing vehicle lives, while others were putting orders off pending decisions on company sales.
- The following years saw steadily increasing volume production, as larger groups began investing, thanks to greater stability. This peaked in 2000. The proportion of single decks was increasing at the expense of double decks but the proportion of midibuses was eclipsing all. They replaced minibuses but also larger vehicles, as passenger numbers fell. By now, in fact, the midibus was completely dominant, and all from a standing start in 1987.
- The years to 2007 saw a general decline in output but, interestingly, were generally at about the same levels in 1975-1980.
- Here, again, the midibus was dominant and by a considerable margin, establishing itself as the vehicle of choice, and remaining relatively constant compared to other chassis types or lengths. As city fleets dispensed with double decks, deckers were significantly down on 1980 and by 2007, even at their peak, and output was less than half that in 1980.
- Note the surge in orders in 2008, fuelled by ridership increases, including free travel, following a couple of good years for the industry. This led to manufacturer confidence and the hiring of permanent and temporary labour, something that has resulted in threatened or actual cut backs of late.
As for 2009, orders placed towards the end of 2008 mean that the graph will steady and not in much decline. 2010, however, is not looking rosy...

10 comments:
I must say that the presentation of the statistics seems rather 'unusual' to say the least.
First of all, the omission of minibuses used for PSV (or PCV) work distorts the figures significantly. Given that those 'Gen 1' minibuses of the early 1980s were often being used to replace larger buses, they surely must be included in any such survey for it to have any value? In turn, some of the later midibus purchases will no doubt have been used to replace those 'Gen 1' minibuses. I appreciate that your comments have explained that point, but the visual presentation of the graph does seem misleading.
Secondly, the presentation of the blocks of colour is also confusing. You mention the dominance of the single deck (green area) in 1975, but on the graph the green area is smaller than the yellow (double deck) area for that year! I realise that in fact there must have been about 1800 double deckers and 2500 single decks, so your description makes sense - but the graph doesn't!
Later on, I have to take issue with one of your conclusions - viz. "The years to 2007 saw a general decline in output but, interestingly, were generally at about the same levels in 1975-1980." I'm not sure that's correct. Taking 1977, there seems to have been about 2000 double deckers and 3000 single deckers - a total of around 5000; but in 2003 there appears to have been 1500 double deckers, 2000 single deckers and 3000 midis - so about 6500 in total, which, to my mind, is significantly different.
I note that the graph comes from Volvo, who don't produce minibuses, so perhaps that explains the exclusion of those vehicles, in the sense that it attempts to show the market from Volvo's perspective. But the blocks of colour are also misleading, and they should really have simply used different coloured curves to show the figures, or, perhaps a bar chart with the different vehicle types above one another, so that the total height of the bar would represent the total production for all types.
As you say, a 'very interesting graph'. But I'm not sure I would agree that 'it says it all'!
Misspelling insight may incite a riot.
The reason GEN1 minibuses are excludes is because they are reported in statistics under vans & commercial, not PSVs.
I am going to disagree with your analysis of the 1975–2008 graph.
The way I see it, the green sector is above the yellow sector, and the pink sector is above the green sector. The green and pink do not go all the way down to zero; they go down as far as the bottom of the colour.
So in 1975, about 75% of orders were for double-deckers, and from 1982 to 1987 (after the demise of the National but before the emergence of the Lynx) there were pretty well no single-deckers bought at all. From 1988 to 1997, the midibus was bought at similar levels to the single- and double-deckers, then had a bit of a growth spurt at about the time of the Solo, and currently accounts for just over a third of new purchases.
On reflection, Stevie D is probably right. But who knows?
If he his, I haven't the energy at this hour to alter the post.
I think the original post is right, and the colours do go down to the bottom. There's no way of telling, but if you look at "our end" of the graph, there's more yellow showing than green - which is wrong as more single-deckers are being bought at the moment.
As I say, there's no way of telling, but my gut instinct for graphs tell me they go to the bottom! If they didn't go from zero, you have to subtract how high they get from where the started on the axis, to get the figures for single- and midibuses, which would be confusing.
Anonymous - I just find it impossible to believe that in the early 1980s, the purchase of single-deckers exactly matched the purchase of double-deckers. It isn't plausible that the number of single-deckers bought has always been higher than the number of double-deckers, even if only be 1.
And think back to the early 1980s (or at least, buses from that era). The Leyland National all but died out in about 1982, and the Lynx didn't enter service until 1986. What other single-deckers (not counting Gen1 minibuses, which aren't included) were being bought then? I can't think of any that were around in great numbers. Compare that with the Leyland Olympians, MCW Metrobuses, Dennis Dominators that were being bought in large numbers at the time. If you look for A-, B- and C-reg buses, you'll find that the vast majority of them are/were double-deckers
Stevie D, I think you need to bear in mind that the figures must include coaches!
As far as I recall, production of Leyland Lynxes followed directly after the last National 2s.
I do think the debate demonstrates how unclear and misleading the graph is. I looked at this page:-
http://www.busandcoach.com/industry.aspx
but it's not easy to reconcile the figures. Busandcoach.com records 848 double deckers in 2008, whereas the graph (assuming 2008 is the right hand end of the chart) suggests more than 1000. The vehicle type classifications may also not be consistent, as busandcoach.com refers to buses 'over 8.5t' which possibly excludes some midis? (Actually that would have excluded a Bristol RELL, which I rate as rather bigger than a midi!)
Definitions are everything here - just what is a 'midi' (in 2009 at least)? These days a Dennis Dart (or whatever it's known as these days) is surely just another single decker? In fact, for many years, it's been the standard single-decker, hasn't it? And to pretty much the same dimensions as Ye Olde Leyland National.
Stevie D - I find it even more impossible that they would make a graph were to find the number of the green and pink, you have to subtract the number of the colour below it.
Post a Comment