Visiting Swansea, you get a real sense that you just can’t win. Everyone from the government down is calling for revolutionary public transport. So, First Cymru, the Welsh assembly & Swansea council go radical and yet face something between unease and a barrage of local ‘nimby’ criticism. Seems so unfair.
The Quadrant bus station Metro stop sees north-bound buses slew across the south-bound lane to wait on the 'wrong' side. This minimises passengers needing to cross for the bus station
Since the 1 June 2009 introduction, First has gradually added Streetcars to its service 4. A week ago today, five of the Volvo B7LA/Wrightbuses were out. Every other bus was a Metro articulated vehicle, enough to give an impression.
Another interesting feature is bus stops opposite each other, even outside the bus only sections. Beyond the red road surfacing is the reduced standard road for other users
The first passenger to whom I spoke called the service “useless”. She stated that ‘they’ had stopped serving some Cross with an unpronounceable name beginning with the letter ‘P’, which meant she now had a 10-minutes walk, not easy with shopping. This seemed to be the case at another point along the route, as a passenger complained that his usual stop was now served only by other, less frequent buses and not Metro. This in spite of Metro passing it, something he couldn’t understand.
All buses can use the city centre Metro infrastructure. Here with Metro are three other First buses, one from Silverline and a private hire taxi. Goods vehicle loading is also permitted
Another felt that we could ill afford such buses in these recessionary times (not realising that they are actually two years old, four of which had seen service in Luton and the remainder were stored. The perception was of all-new buses).
The Hafod bus only road is shared between Metro and the Landore park & ride. Here, a Streetcar goes through the gates, leaving a particularly congested Neath Road to other local services
More than one commented that Metro was “empty most of the time”. This wasn’t evident during my short visit. There were journeys where the 42-seaters were half full but there were off-peak times with standees & every seat occupied. I was impressed by the number of mothers-with-buggies who would crane & peer inside when FTR ‘landed’ at their stop. There were nominally four buggy spaces though I saw more on board.
Not all the infrastructure is quite in place
It was true, however, that there was a more positive view *inside* FTR than out. In their usual way, passengers didn’t seem over-excited but they tended to like the environment within and the conductor service offered. And they liked the flexibility of boarding at both doors, welcoming the swiftness this and conductors brought. A cautious thumbs up, then.
This was not the case regarding non-users. As you might expect, there was some criticism over the way Swansea had realigned the city centre’s roads to accommodate Metro. More than one claimed that the innovative central priority—available to all local buses—had throttled the city and businesses had apparently closed as a result. Were these peripheral shops, I wondered? To be honest, there was little evidence of a down-at-heel city centre and it would be difficult during a recession to attribute closures to Metro.
One person at least cottoned on to the theory behind Metro, by suggesting that First might’ve been better trying double decks to increase passenger numbers. This, though, missed the point entirely.
Infrastructure improvements range from bus only roads to a bus gate at Singleton Hospital to priorities at roundabouts to building out bus stops. Notice the half-obscured 'bus stop' markings as the kerb is extended to assist the 18.5m artics, seen here at MorristonIt was in the suburb of Morriston where there was most Metro vitriol. Residents in Chemical Road are particularly intolerant at so many Metros squeezing their way through the interestingly named, long residential street. And Streetcar certainly dominates the streetscape, though it only seems to be inconsiderate parking that causes problems. The Streetcar is wider than your average bus but, being articulated, Streetcar is just as manoeuvrable. I wonder what Chemical Road residents might think about passengers on double decks peering into their upper windows.
Poster in a Chemical Road window: beware of the dog and beware of the bendy bus
My lasting memory of Metro was a positive one. It’s of two young children who with their parents were waving to the Metro ‘pilot’ as if they were greeting a train driver. That gave me hope for the success of Metro in Swansea. If youngsters recognise Metro as different, may be in time dissenters will, too. Perhaps, then, everyone can win after all, as the bus plays its part in reducing traffic in the city.

5 comments:
At a time when bendy-buses are being phased out in London one has to wonder why other places (eg Swansea / First Group) are anxious to introduce them? Especially if, as some of your interviewees have said, they omit stops that passengers want to use!
Agreed, FTR is revolutionary and innovative, but is the innovation practical or useful? Innovation is a concept beloved of politicians - the previous German chancellor once made a speech, about which commentators soon poked fun at the number of times he used the word 'innovation'. Innovation is fine if it provides a solution to a problem that would not otherwise be solved, but is that really the case here?
I'm not sure why the person who suggested double deckers would have been better was 'missing the point'. Double deckers have more seats, which means more comfort for the passengers, and also makes the conductor's work easier - given that there seems to have to be a conductor. They also take up less road and garage space, and are less complicated to maintain than an artic single decker. FTR is still a bus, it's not a train or a tram or a trolleybus, and nobody is going to be fooled into thinking it is anything else, and one should not be surprised that the travelling (and non-travelling) public are unimpressed by such 'marketing tactics'. As for the cost of the buses, I don't think that the fact that they are two years old makes much difference - the ongoing operating and maintenance costs will still be higher.
Omitting stops to speed up the journey is a typical way for an operator to save money - decrease the running time sufficiently, and you can save a bus. Great. Think of the savings, and the opportunity to advertise a faster service. Except, of course, for those passengers who have to walk further to get to the stop - as your research showed. For them, the end to end journey time will not be quicker, but might actually be longer. So where is the advantage for them? I don't think you should be surprised by cynicism and criticism in such cases - people are not so easily fooled by such 'innovation'.
Call me a cynic, but I fear this is just another example of the bus operating industry going (or being led) down a blind alley with inappropriate, and cost-ineffective, innovation.
What exactly defines FTR? Cool-looking vehicles? While fresh design ideas are to be welcomed, that alone will hardly make a huge impact. Dedicated infrastructure permitting better punctuality and more competitive journey times? Very good idea. But the same measures could also be applied to conventional bus services. Faster boarding thanks to mutiple doors? Again, this is something that would have been possible on any bus on any service, but that operators have chosen not to do. So either operators have been missing a point for the last hundred years or so (which I doubt) or there are good reasons against this which FTR choses to ignore. So what we have is a mix of good ideas mixes with some neat packagining, it remians IMHO an attempt to make something that is almost as good as a modern tram without putting up the money for a modern tram. Well, you get what you pay for.
ftr was never going to be popular in Swansea as many are still upset about the Mubmles tram being closed years ago and say that the money would have been better spent re-opening this than on the metro.
I personally prefer the Metro system as all bus services in th city benefit as the traffic previously was terrible holding up all services but now busses in teh area benfit from a step up from a bus lane
Interesting that the article picks up on the vehicle and the infrastructure. Yes those are important elements of the project, and they will have an effect on users. However, ftr is all about doing something that gets people, especially car drivers, thinking about public transport as a realistic alternative for some journeys. The project is all about generating modal shift. Ordinary buses of whatever size just blend into the background. ftr gets people talking, and I applaud Swansea for having the gumption to run with the project.
Post a Comment