Today is likely to see the Conservative party launch a policy aimed at transforming rural travel. Taking out the party politics of it all, the plan is to offer demand responsive or semi-demand responsive taxis to remote rural areas. Given the possible proposed funding, could this be as significant in policy terms as the Transport Act 1985?
The first comment to make is that public transport in rural areas isn’t as bad as people perceive it to be. True, there may no longer be the evening departure home (traditionally as late as 2130!) or even an early morning service (how well are such buses used even in urban areas?).
If you happen to live on an inter-urban bus route, you probably have a half decent bus service or better. There are still many rural areas that can sustain a regular bus service to their nearby town, with or without direct subsidy, and perhaps operating at marginal cost on the back of a school bus or two. Education transport is still the key to rural bus service provision as it has been for 40 years since the National Bus Company famously introduced the idea of marginal costing and the peak vehicle requirement. Park the larger vehicle up during the day between schools and you squander a resource.
But that doesn’t mean everyone’s adequately served. The answer has to be something more flexible (this is not new—we are already seeing examples of these), not only for those who wish to continue living in the country beyond their driving licence expiry but also to reach increasingly decentralised health care provision, for example. And this is the second comment. Flexible services operated by smaller more realistically vehicles cannot run in isolation. They, too, need to have links with education transport. And why not health? Getting non-patient emergency transport on board’s been something of a transport holy grail. Too often, the various components of the health sector have been unwilling to play.
Thirdly, sometimes where flexible services have been tried they’ve proven to be quite costly and not always cheaper than a small bus at marginal cost. There’s evidence that some of these services are being replaced by fixed services as cutbacks.
And fifthly, there needs changes to the way in which the taxi industry operates. Too often, taxi firms cannot see the benefits of such operation or when they do they price expensively. It’s not in the nature of the taxi business to operate to a flexible schedule. Taxi firms therefore need nurturing. Will there also need to be changes to the law to ensure that passengers can more easily use private hire vehicles on semi-fixed routes? PHVs are often the bedrock of taxi provision in rural areas.
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
Role for Taxis
Posted
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

2 comments:
While I agree with much of what you've said, I can't help but feel that specialist bus operators have just as much to offer in this sector. Using an 8-12 seater wheelchair accessible minibus can sometimes be of more benefit than a smaller taxi, even if it costs more to run - though in real terms it is likely that any service such as this will be run with local authority funding!
If we take Lincolnshire as an example, a very rural county, they run a network of semi-flexible and demand responsive routes branded as 'CallConnect' which feed into interchange points accross the county, where passengers can connect with the main inter-urban (or InterConnect) routes, which are higly successful and run to an hourly timetable.
The vehicles used on this work are almost exclusively wheel-chair accesible 8 seater Renualt Masters (with a couple of obligatory Optare Solos for one of the busier services). The routes all get good loadings, and the connections generally work as advertised. This leaves passengers in rurual areas reasurred that they don't have to spend money on a taxi, when they have a bus they are (likely) to be able to use for free.
A majority of the services are run by TransLinc and Stagecoach, but the booking centre and 'control room' are unified, so people only have to remember one phone number, or for the very brave, you can book your bus online!
The coverage for the network is quite extensive when the size of Lincolnshire is considered:
http://www.lincsinterconnect.com/map-callconnect.phtml
Previous comment obviously not written by a Call Connect user!!!
I live in Lincolnshire and have tried to use it, but one 8 seater minibus cannot adequately meet the needs of a geographically diverse rural population in its allocated 'patch' of typically some ten miles radius from its central point.
Can't be in two places at once, and two consecutive pick up points may be 20 miles apart. OK if you've got all the time in the world perhaps . . .
Post a Comment