Friday, 8 May 2009

Least of our Worries

Pseudonymous has a second contribution. Re-read the first here...

The recession may well be the least of a number of worries for many bus operators.

While the recession is clearly having an impact on rail travel and especially long distance, the bus market appears much more robust. Go Ahead clearly impressed the markets with its continuing solid performances at its franchises, while National Express looks to be at considerable risk from it's East Coast Main Line operation.

Reports from across the country indicate the status quo of a mixture of stagnation, decline, and growth in bus travel.

In our own back yard there are still significant operators posting strong passenger growth, and so shouldn't all be well in the bus stations of Southern England?

Sadly, holding your ground in a recession doesn't seem to be enough at the moment.

Bus operators, especially the big groups seem to have finally tired of the concessionary fares debacle. In many areas operators have spent huge sums on the lawyers and advisers for three years' worth of appeals, yet still they haven't reached the point where they can manage with the current arrangements for payment for free travel. Faced with another round of appeals needing to be submitted imminently against multiple local authority schemes, and despite Stagecoach and Go Ahead both being in the process of extremely expensive High Court legal challenges against the Department for Transport, it seems that operators are giving up on their 'waiting game'.

While they continue to appeal and take action, it seems as though they are turning a corner. For some years now they have been very hesitant about axing routes, preferring to sit tight and hope that the concessionary payments come right. Some have tinkered, some been a bit more willing to make cuts, mainly to those routes that carry almost exclusively free travellers. The reluctance to cut is most likely in the knowledge that business lost will be lost forever. It appears that operators have been taking the pain in the hope that things will work out.

Yet word from within a number of operators suggests that they have decided that enough is enough—that their businesses cannot sustain the additional costs and reduced revenues that free travel has brought them. Apparently there are a number of them now working through the detail of significant network reworkings, poised to wield the axe in the remainder of 2009.

Word has reached them too that the government is not to rebate the 2p increase in duty on a litre of diesel either. To bus operators who pay a lower price per litre than other motorists that 2p in a significant percentage increase in their fuel costs.

The recession may be hitting many businesses hard, and government may be bending over backwards to prop up some sectors of industry and commerce. It seems however that public transport is one area where, as over many decades, successive governments fail to understand fully the importance of the services that are provided to every community in England.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

THE DABATE CONTINUES.CAN SOMEONE ENLIGHTEN ME.WHAT ADDITIONAL COSTS?WHAT LOST REVENUE.THE ONLY ADDITIONAL COST I CAN SEE ID WEAR AND TEAR ON SEATS.SURELY IF THE BIG OPERATORS TAKE THEIR CAse to what is to them the logical conclusion where will be be?if they sabotage the the scheme by refusing to operate it where will we be.to me they would be facing nationalisation.the government would stop subsidies,tendered ervices would no longer be paid for etc.whats the answer?

RedRover said...

Mr Anonymous, if you cannot see the flaw in your logic, then here's a hint about how to take *your* argument to it's 'logical conclusion': If it's such a great scheme, why not extend it to the entire populace?

Anyway, just continue with your hysteria, treasure your bus pass (after all you've 'paid for it' with your taxes, you will undoubtably claim), and make the most of the buses while they last.

Anonymous said...

Under theold half fare scheme us companies usually received about 90% of the fare for locals, half from the passenger the rest made up from the local Council. They received 100% of the fare from visitors, especially relevant in tourist areas.

Now they can receive 40ish% for all thos passengers. On that basis they have to carry pretty much3 times a many OAPs just to retain the cash they had before.

The biggest additional cost is additional frequency. Especially in tourist and areas with high elderly populations, the growth has required more buses. Put simply, many operators are carrying vastly more customers on expanded networks, for little if any extra income.

A Cumbrian said...

Obviously it is difficult to work out the best way to do it.

The standard refund mechanism is (some areas have more complicated formulae, in West Yorkshire it includes RPI indexing)

average fare X mystery factor = compensation

The average fare is fairly easy. You can use survey and flash data to work out what tickets are used for how many trips.

The mystery factor has to cover
* a reduction for the additional trips carried by "free" (or cheaper?) capacity
* a reduction for concessions operators might offer to oldies anyway
* an increase where additional seats (in some form or other) are required

Additionally for some LAs the mystery factor might, ceteri paribus be different 'by rights' between operators depending on the types of services they run. Obviously to adjust the formula in such a way would be inequitable (and also nigh on impossible as the operator profiles would change extremely regularly).

In Scotland and Wales there must be more money (centrally funded) for these things as operators are happy and thus effectively certain types of trips are subsidised (as the mystery factor could be lower for 'no better or worse')

Frankly the only long term answer to these is either (1) to accept and fund it is a subsidy to the bus industry (and particularly for certain types of trips) or (2) to run buses yourselves and charge fares you think are 'just'.