It ain’t easy being a start up operator and in truth it never has been. It’s more likely you’ll go the way of Charlie’s Cars* than Brian Souter. To become successful means finding a niche but searching for a new one is increasingly difficult—if you can find one at all. If there’s something that can reasonably be exploited, it probably already has been.
So it is, over one year on, that the latest changes proposed at Eastleigh’s Black Velvet Travel see another volte-face. Buses on the Fair Oak Flyer are now marking time and will end after last operation on 23 May 2009. This after only 132 days. News was given at a Velvet staff meeting about ten days ago. As was some other unpleasant information...
Ser 200 Fair Oak Flyer, direct to Fair Oak
The decision follows both a drop in fares and an increase in frequency on Solent Blue Line/Bluestar’s competitive service 2 on the Eastleigh-Fair Oak section. Free travel payments are apparently contributory. In truth, with 10 buses total an hour, the corridor seems to have become over bussed, with too many journeys carrying too few passengers. In spite of the direct Flyer route and Velvet’s noted customer service, frequency on an indirect but established route (service 2) is perhaps more important over such a relatively short distance.

Velvet's fairoakflyer.co.uk website used to transform from blue to purple
On the positive side, Velvet is man enough to accept when things don’t always go to plan. The company has a willingness to try new ideas and no one should ever knock them for having a go (when many in the industry are totally risk averse). There are, after all, plenty of examples of high stakes products brought to the general market that’ve failed. New Coca Cola. Polaroid. Apple III and Apple Lisa. Windows M.E. Why should the bus industry be any different?
One of four East Lancs Myllenium-bodied DAF SB220s at Vevlet
The interesting thing here, though, is that following the B/BeepBus fiasco, Velvet’s managing director Phil Stockley in discussing the Fair Oak Flyer has openly used challenging language in the media against his former employer SBL/Bluestar. Understandably, the press seems very interested in this sort of thing and when they realise the latest developments will no doubt portray this as a victory for the aggressive big boy (rather than what it is, SBL defending its market against a predatory operator).
If you look at Velvet’s turbulent history, you see somewhat mixed fortunes:
- 25 February 2008 sees Velvet service A start, initially at a half-hourly frequency, following SBL’s withdrawal. This is soon halved to hourly.
- 27 May 2008 and Velvet wins the Hampshire contract for the former X35 from Ringwood to Southampton.
- 8 September 2008 is when Velvet B takes to the road commercially, between Eastleigh & Southampton, where possible astutely avoiding SBL workings, partly replacing SBL’s B, providing a through service from Velmore Estate to Southampton and enabling crew changes to and from the Ringwoods.
- On the same date, SBL operates BeepBus B, mirroring Velvet by three minutes throughout, operating free of charge for the first week to circumnavigate the registration rules.
- 10 January 2009 sees the last operation of the Southampton-Ringwood services, together with the B, into which it connected.
- 12 January 2009 and Velvet commences its optimistic direct 15-minute Fair Oak Flyer between Eastleigh & Fair Oak. SBL cuts fares locally on the 2. Velvet also commences broadly hourly Eastleigh-Swaythling-Portswood-Southampton service 500; and evening services under contract on the E8 between Eastleigh & Boyatt Wood.
- 23 February 2009 and SBL cuts the through Eastleigh-Fair Oak-Southampton service on the 2 to every 20 minutes while increasing instead to every 10 minutes between Eastleigh & Fair Oak.
- 23 February 2009 also sees Velvet win a short-term tender to the end of August 2009 to operate the former SBL C1/2 between Eastleigh, Chandlers Ford, Hiltingbury/Valley Park.
- 18 April 2009 is the last day of the 500, lasting 97 days and its withdrawal is consequent upon not only disappointing loadings but mainly owing to winning the C1/2s earlier.
- 23 May 2009 and the Fair Oak Flyer is withdrawn.
Added to which, Velvet is vulnerable should the substantive tender for the C1/2 fall elsewhere. But there’s no doubt that Velvet might usefully concentrate on the tendered market more in future, as a lower cost operator. It might stand more of a chance of winning the battle on paper for a tender than commercially on the streets. Now that Go South Coast has largely straightened out SBL/Bluestar, will there be any such tenders available any time soon?
And, finally, what of SBL/Bluestar on the 2s? Will this go back to the pre-Flyer every 15 minutes between Eastleigh & Southampton, abandoning the shorts but concentrating on important Swaythling? Or would passengers find another destabilising change frustrating?
i Photos by Southdown PD3 and Southern England Bus Photographs (both used with permission)
* At dereg, Charlie’s Cars exploited a niche by initially operating a network focused on the Hampshire Centre (now Castlepoint) on Castle Lane West

8 comments:
As that an almost biblical reference I see? Out of the darkness?
Velvet is offering an excellent service on the C1/C2, which is more than be said of its predecessor, who was never interested in this route
But excellence of service rarely wins through at retender time : (
Yes, I even saw an Iveco on it the other day - excellent!
I don't think it's fair to refer to Velvet as predatory. SBL's response was the normal one when someone offers something different and new - to register an identical service 5 minutes earlier (2 minutes in the case of the B). If there is no opportunity to challenge the dominant operators views about where passengers want to go and how they want to get there, how will we know where they really want to go (and how they really want to get there)
I think the 4th poster makes a rather cheap swipe. The Iveco as I understand it was an extremely short term hired-in spare, as will always be needed from time to time in small fleets where the number of permanent spare vehicles is obviously small. Velvet has a very reasonable 20% spare capacity over and above pvr, very similar percentage wise to most large fleets, but nonetheless in absolute terms amounts to just 2 vehicles which obviously can sometimes go wrong simultaniously. I think (although I'm not absolutely certain) that the Iveco was there for weeks rather than months, only saw service as an absolute last resort during that time, has long since returned to whence it came.
If today's post is accurate there may well be good reason to criticise Velvet's business strategy over the last year, but I think that by any impartial measure its customer service, customer satisfaction, punctuality, reliability, presentation of fleet and staff etc. are all quite hard to fault when compared to other operators.
6th Poster - Some points are valid but as someone said on these pages a while ago, Velvet is nothing amazing compared to others, and living in Eastleigh, I'm afraid that consistent day-to-day staff and vehicle presentation are not what would be defined as "acceptable standards", particularly in a competitive market place...
The Iveco is still about today, has received Velvet fleetnames on the front bonnet and was certainly used last week in service.
If on one hand the attitude or performance of a big groupis questioned, then it would be unfair on the other hand to defend such items as fleet spares - crucial to service delivery, which is what it's all about - on behalf of smaller independent operators.
The presentation of vehicles,both internally and externally, actually makes other operators look a far more attractive travel option.
Load levels seen lately would suggest the operator may be filling a niche, but is there a market in that niche ?
Post a Comment