Tuesday, 24 June 2008

Ventilation

I recall an article (now long lost) in a copy of Buses Magazine of the late 1960s on the conundrum of a batch of Bristol Omnibus Bristol/ECW MWs (or was it REs?) and their inconsistent arrangement of hoppers and slider ventilators. The article left an impression far beyond its original purpose or intention. It seemed to typify the enthusiast of the time and the interest in minutiƦ the hobby generated.

Let us not forget the importance of ventilators and hoppers. Aside from a minority of buses now equipped with aircon, ventilators and hoppers have proven their worth over many, many decades in airing buses. There really is no cheap alternative to getting fresh air through a vehicle other, of course, than an open rear platform.

Whatever the arrangement on modern buses, the issue of ventilation does remains an issue, though, not least because we are now in summer. But it also can be a minor irritation to passengers, too, especially in spring and autumn or in colder, wetter weather.

I’ve always found it interesting that passengers in search of air will open their adjacent ventilator, the one immediately above their head, and not the one forward of where they sit. This means that they get almost no benefit at all from the ventilator but that people behind them, who may be happy with their own micro-climate, suddenly have it disturbed. In typical British fashion, we rarely complain, putting up with the rush of unwanted cold air.

Even so, ventilation is of importance. But thankfully we’ve lost the front-facing upper deck hinged ventilators of old that would send an unwelcome blast of Siberian air all the way down the upper deck—just because someone at the front was feeling hot.

2 comments:

RC169 said...

I suspect that the article you are referring to is Allan Macfarlane's piece on 'The EHWs' which appeared in the December 1971 issue of 'Buses', and concerned a batch of LD type Lodekkas. It was an unfortunate combination - the buses seem to have been the first for BOC fitted with Cave-Brown-Cave heating, more effective than previous types, and they also had less opening windows, and those that did open were of the 'hopper' type, with a considerably reduced opening, rather than the slider type previously used. Additionally, the vehicles were delivered at the beginning of a hot summer - so you can understand why the article was subtitled 'Or step into my oven'! And, yes, I guess you're right, it is typical enthusiast minutiae - but it is surely worth getting to the underlying reasons as to why buses exhibited these perhaps trivial (to some people) differences? And I guess that for the people who passed out in the heat while travelling on a new EHW it wouldn't have been trivial at all!

As far as ventilation goes, Bristol OC seems to have been put off the hopper ventilators, as used by ECW, for some time after the EHWs arrived, which is perhaps unfortunate. The conventional sliding windows tend to cause draughts which irritate passengers, while the hoppers (as used by ECW) directed the air such that it would flow upwards (towards the ceiling) which must have reduced the draughts to some extent. Unfortunately, more modern designs of hopper windows are much larger, and don't seem to have the gussets at the sides that the ECW ones had, so that the irritating draughts are generated again. A case of a simpler design being cheaper (relatively) but probably a false economy. British Rail seemed to find a more effective solution on the Mark 1 carriages, with shorter sliders and four segments to the opening part of the windows. These had a metal fillet to reduce draughts, and also a position marked 'Open to here for draught-free ventilation' - and, from my memory, this worked reasonably well. Some bus operators tried shorter slider sections, for example, Hants and Dorset had some 1962/3 MW coaches with 4 sections to the opening part of the windows; and some Plaxton Panorama Elite and Duple Dominant coaches were built with similar sliders, though in these cases, the windows were rather longer than on conventional buses.

Another idea was the spinning roof ventilators that seem to be popular on small minibuses - I'm not sure how effective those are/were, but I suspect the draught problem might have been less.

Air conditioning is probably seen in some quarters as the answer, but it is not always healthy, and certainly not environmentally friendly, and I cannot see it being widely accepted in these days of rapidly rising fuel costs. So I guess the hoppers and sliders are here to stay, in one form or another!

Matt said...

Thankfully? Those front-opening windows are the most important windows of all - they're the only windows you actually need, and buses are extremely unpleasant to travel on without the air flow they provide. Wind-downs would be even better, as you can let in just as much as you need, and then close it if you don't. Passengers clamour for this, manufacturers and operators turn up their noses.